I've been on a bit of a space propulsion kick recently between getting a copy of High Frontier, rediscovering Atomic Rockets, doing an archive binge on Selenian Boondocks, and generally following all the excitement around SpaceX. I thought I'd write up a few blog posts on what I think of as the interesting bits. Be warned that there'll be a bit of math involved but I'll try to keep it from getting out of hand.

So, lets say you want to go to space today. Maybe you even want to head out to the Moon or Mars or Ceres. When you travel on the Earth in a car or plane or boat the hard part is energy you spend is going to be in used to overcome the resistance of whatever medium you're traveling in. You get up to some maximum speed and have to exert your motor constantly to stay at that speed. When you want to stop you simply stop applying force and maybe apply a brake as well, neither of which require fuel.

Space travel isn't like that. Once you leave the atmosphere you can use your engine once and then pretty much coast as long as you want. Of course with no atmosphere or ground to you also need to use your engine again if you want to change direction or stop. So in theory if you want to go from point A to point B and you're really patient you can just turn your engine very briefly and then slowly coast to where you want to go until you turn it on again to stop. And if you want to get there faster you'll just have to burner it longer as you start and stop.

Well, that would be how things would work if were out in the middle of perfectly empty space. But as it turns out most of the interesting stuff near by is orbiting around other things like the Sun or the Earth and if you want to get to where you're going you have to worry about orbital mechanics. I'm not going to get into those (if you want to learn more you should really try playing Kerbal Space Program) but the important point is that there's a minimum speed you need to be going to leave one orbit and go to a different one. If you're in orbit around Earth at a height of 200 km and the place you want to go is also in orbit around Earth at 200 km then great, you can get there with a super short burn and patience. But if you want to go to a different orbit then you need to change your velocity by a certain amount called a Δv. Here's a handy chart that can tell you how big that amount is for various destinations you might want to go to.

To travel rockets invariably expel propellant out their back and since for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction this accelerates the rocket forward. How large a change in velocity a rocket achieves after a burn is governed by something called the rocket equation that follows.

Where Δv is the change in velocity, v

_{e}is the velocity that the propellant is expelled at, m_{0}is the "wet" mass of the rocket that includes all the propellant being used, and m_{1}is the "dry" mass of the rocket after the propellant has been used. So if 63% of a rocket's starting mass is propellant its final velocity will be the same as the velocity at which it was ejecting its propellant. So ideally if you want to have a lot of Δv you also want to have a very high propellant velocity too. From the prospective of the rocket equation you want that velocity to be as high as possible, in fact.
Sadly there's another limit here that rears its head. If you throw enough propellant to accelerate your rocket by a certain amount you've imparted a momentum of m

_{propellant}* v_{e}. But the energy it takes to throw that propellant is going to be ½ m_{propellant}* v_{e}^{2}. Divide one by the other and it turns out that for each bit of Δv you generate you have to pay energy proportional to your v_{e}. Or in other words the more mass efficient your rocket is the less energy efficient it is.
## No comments:

## Post a Comment